Compare AI models: Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
- Mistral Medium 3.1MistralHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Mistral Medium 3.5MistralHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | 0/100 — Reasoning not supported | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 36/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 25/100 | 64/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
131K
262K
Reasoning
False
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$1.50/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$7.50/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.15/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMistral Medium 3.1 vs Jamba MiniMistral Medium 3.1·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMistral Medium 3.5 vs Jamba MiniMistral Medium 3.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMistral Medium 3.1 vs Jamba LargeMistral Medium 3.1·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMistral Medium 3.5 vs Jamba LargeMistral Medium 3.5·Jamba Large