Compare AI models: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Mistral Medium 3.5MistralHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 25/100 | 64/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 32/100 | 96/100 | 63/100 | 54/100 | 50/100 | 55/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.50/ 1M
$0.18/ 1M
Output
$7.50/ 1M
$1.11/ 1M
Cached input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMistral Medium 3.5 vs Jamba MiniMistral Medium 3.5·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba MiniStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMistral Medium 3.5 vs Jamba LargeMistral Medium 3.5·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba LargeStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba Large