Compare AI models: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Mistral Small 3
- Mistral Medium 3.5MistralHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Mistral Small 3MistralHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 66/100 | 25/100 | 64/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Mistral Small 3 | 0/100 — Reasoning not supported | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 12/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 — Tool calling not supported |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
33K
Reasoning
True
False
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.50/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$7.50/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.15/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMistral Medium 3.5 vs Jamba MiniMistral Medium 3.5·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMistral Small 3 vs Jamba MiniMistral Small 3·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMistral Medium 3.5 vs Jamba LargeMistral Medium 3.5·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMistral Small 3 vs Jamba LargeMistral Small 3·Jamba Large