Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Mistral Large 4MistralHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Mistral Large 4 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 49/100 | 93/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.68/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$2.09/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.07/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.9M
No usage
Completed sessions
35,153,057
No usage
Token share
20.6%
No usage
Tokens
200T+100%
No usage
AUG 18OCT 12
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.2%249K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMistral Large 4 vs Jamba MiniMistral Large 4·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMistral Large 4 vs Jamba LargeMistral Large 4·Jamba Large