Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | 77/100 | 100/100 | 36/100 | 80/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | 0/100 | 37/100 | 86/100 | 61/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.32/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
Output
$3.96/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
26
283K
Completed sessions
422
5,859,352
Token share
0%
0.48%
Tokens
72M+100%
4.5T+4,171%
AUG 13OCT 7
AUG 13OCT 7
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba Large