Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- Qwen3.8 Max 0902AlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max 0902 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 25/100 | 82/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | 77/100 | 100/100 | 30/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$1.32/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$3.96/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
26
Completed sessions
No usage
422
Token share
No usage
0%
Tokens
No usage
72M+100%
No trend data
AUG 30OCT 24
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max 0902·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max 0902·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba Mini