Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- Qwen3.8 Max 0902AlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max 0902 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 30/100 | 80/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | 77/100 | 100/100 | 36/100 | 80/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$1.32/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$3.96/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
26
Completed sessions
No usage
422
Token share
No usage
0%
Tokens
No usage
72M+100%
No trend data
AUG 11OCT 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max 0902·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Jamba LargeQwen3.8 Max 0902·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba Large