Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
- MAI-Code-1.1-FlashMicrosoftHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | 77/100 | 100/100 | 36/100 | 80/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 |
| MAI-Code-1.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 63/100 | 51/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.32/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Output
$3.96/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
26
No usage
Completed sessions
422
No usage
Token share
0%
No usage
Tokens
72M+100%
No usage
AUG 13OCT 7
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMAI-Code-1.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Jamba LargeMAI-Code-1.1-Flash·Jamba Large