Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- Mistral Medium 3.5MistralHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 25/100 | 75/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 66/100 | 27/100 | 62/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$1.50/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$7.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.1M
No usage
Completed sessions
37,128,352
No usage
Token share
15%
No usage
Tokens
145T-38%
No usage
AUG 18OCT 12
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.3%272K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMistral Medium 3.5 vs Jamba MiniMistral Medium 3.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMistral Medium 3.5 vs Jamba LargeMistral Medium 3.5·Jamba Large