Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Mistral Medium 3.5MistralHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 59/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 25/100 | 64/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$1.50/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$7.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2M
No usage
Completed sessions
36,514,032
No usage
Token share
21.1%
No usage
Tokens
204T+100%
No usage
AUG 19OCT 13
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.2%249K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMistral Medium 3.5 vs Jamba MiniMistral Medium 3.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMistral Medium 3.5 vs Jamba LargeMistral Medium 3.5·Jamba Large