GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5

  1. Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Mistral Medium 3.5MistralHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Qwen3.8 Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder71/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Mistral Medium 3.550/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder25/10063/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$1.50/ 1M
Output
$0.47/ 1M
$7.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
212K
No usage
Completed sessions
1,789,730
No usage
Token share
0.26%
No usage
Tokens
2.7T+100%
No usage
AUG 26OCT 20
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
62.8%9.6K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.