Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.7
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 41/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 25/100 | 74/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.04/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$2.09/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.21/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
398K
73K
Completed sessions
1,518,695
183,739
Token share
0.42%
0.01%
Tokens
5.6T-79%
90B+100%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
56%30K user-weeks
44.4%1.9K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba Mini