CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Laguna S 2.1PoolsideHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 60/100 | 80/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 84/100 | 92/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.2M
107K
Completed sessions
20,616,485
3,319,103
Token share
15.3%
0.13%
Tokens
138T+100%
1.1T+100%
AUG 7OCT 1
AUG 7OCT 1
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
58.4%102K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeLaguna S 2.1 vs Jamba MiniLaguna S 2.1·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonLaguna S 2.1 vs Jamba LargeLaguna S 2.1·Jamba Large