Compare AI models: Grok 4.7 vs GLM-5.3
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5.3Zhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 25/100 | 74/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GLM-5.3 | 85/100 | 100/100 | 30/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 100/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
500K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$4.18/ 1M
Cached input
$0.50/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
73K
271K
Completed sessions
182,582
926,134
Token share
0.01%
0.1%
Tokens
90B+100%
1.4T+26%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
44.4%1.9K user-weeks
45.5%16K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.3 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3·Jamba Mini