Compare AI models: Grok 4.7 vs GLM-5.2

Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
GLM-5.2Zhipu

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Grok 4.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	71/100	25/100	75/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
GLM-5.2	100/100	100/100	30/100	81/100	0/100	88/100

Overview

Author

xAI

Zhipu

Context length

500K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Pdf

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

xAI

Zhipu

Pricing

Input

$2.00/ 1M

$1.20/ 1M

Output

$6.00/ 1M

$4.18/ 1M

Cached input

$0.50/ 1M

$0.30/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

67K

131K

Completed sessions

166,128

621,661

Token share

0.01%

0.05%

Tokens

83B+100%

597B-87%

SEP 9NOV 3

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

44.4%1.9K user-weeks

51.4%10K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGLM-5.2 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.2Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7Jamba Mini Related comparisonGLM-5.2 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.2Jamba Mini