Compare AI models: Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 14/100 | 71/100 | 63/100 | 93/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
500K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$0.61/ 1M
Cached input
$0.50/ 1M
$0.0028/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
48K
86K
Completed sessions
117,668
359,507
Token share
0.01%
0.07%
Tokens
62B+100%
810B-64%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
44.7%1.2K user-weeks
63.6%4.3K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.5-Pro·Jamba Mini