Compare AI models: Grok 4.6 vs GLM-5
- Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 4.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 39/100 | 26/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GLM-5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 34/100 | 39/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
500K
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$2.69/ 1M
Cached input
$0.50/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
59K
20K
Completed sessions
134,041
38,070
Token share
0.01%
0%
Tokens
69B+553%
5.8B-87%
AUG 30OCT 24
AUG 30OCT 24
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
41.3%3.3K user-weeks
63.7%270 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5·Jamba Mini