Compare AI models: Grok 4.5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Grok 4.5xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5.3-FlashZhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 4.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 90/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 57/100 |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | 56/100 | 35/100 | 72/100 | 82/100 | 67/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
500K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.12/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$0.42/ 1M
Cached input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
7.2K
1M
Completed sessions
38,250
13,241,361
Token share
0%
2.73%
Tokens
758M-99%
31T-32%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
46.4%373 user-weeks
63.2%93K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGrok 4.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.3-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.3-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGrok 4.5 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.3-Flash vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3-Flash·Jamba Mini