Compare AI models: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Grok 4.5
- Ling 3.0 Flash FininclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.5xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 84/100 | 63/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 90/100 | 27/100 | 74/100 | 33/100 | 57/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.07/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.22/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
14K
Completed sessions
No usage
41,439
Token share
No usage
0%
Tokens
No usage
3.5B-97%
No trend data
AUG 25OCT 19
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
46.4%373 user-weeks