Compare AI models: Hy4 vs GLM-5.2
- Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5.2Zhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hy4 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 40/100 | 92/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GLM-5.2 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 31/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 88/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.83/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Output
$2.50/ 1M
$4.18/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.1K
127K
Completed sessions
7,498
601,458
Token share
0%
0.04%
Tokens
15B+100%
575B-86%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
51.4%10K user-weeks