Compare AI models: Hy4 vs Grok 4.7
- Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hy4 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 40/100 | 92/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 24/100 | 74/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.83/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$2.50/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.7K
72K
Completed sessions
6,240
179,278
Token share
0%
0.01%
Tokens
11B+100%
89B+100%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
44.4%1.9K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeHy4 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonHy4 vs Jamba MiniHy4·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba Mini