Compare AI models: Step 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
- MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 3.7 Flash | 32/100 | 96/100 | 59/100 | 53/100 | 50/100 | 55/100 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | 44/100 | 100/100 | 59/100 | 92/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
256K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.43/ 1M
Output
$1.15/ 1M
$0.87/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.0036/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
168K
Completed sessions
No usage
831,662
Token share
No usage
0.27%
Tokens
No usage
3.6T+100%
No trend data
SEP 12NOV 6
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
66.8%6.8K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeStep 3.7 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructStep 3.7 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba MiniStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.6-Pro·Jamba Mini