Compare AI models: Step 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.7
- Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 3.7 Flash | 32/100 | 96/100 | 60/100 | 53/100 | 50/100 | 55/100 |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 25/100 | 74/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
256K
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.20/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.15/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
73K
Completed sessions
No usage
183,035
Token share
No usage
0.01%
Tokens
No usage
90B+100%
No trend data
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
44.4%1.9K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeStep 3.7 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructStep 3.7 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba MiniStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba Mini