CompareAI models
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603StepFun
- MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 3.5 Flash 2603 | 100/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 54/100 | 0/100 | 90/100 |
| MiMo-V2.5 | 100/100 | No data | 81/100 | 93/100 | 67/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
256K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.14/ 1M
Output
$0.30/ 1M
$0.28/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.003/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
1M
Completed sessions
No usage
12,942,285
Token share
No usage
7.28%
Tokens
No usage
32T+214%
No trend data
JUL 4AUG 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
69.6%15K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeStep 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITStep 3.5 Flash 2603·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITMiMo-V2.5·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonStep 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextStep 3.5 Flash 2603·Qwen3.8 Flash NextRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextMiMo-V2.5·Qwen3.8 Flash Next