CompareAI models
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603StepFun
- MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 3.5 Flash 2603 | 100/100 | 92/100 | 82/100 | 53/100 | 0/100 | 90/100 |
| MiMo-V2.5 | 100/100 | No data | 80/100 | 93/100 | 67/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
256K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.14/ 1M
Output
$0.30/ 1M
$0.28/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.0028/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
387K
Completed sessions
No usage
1,470,038
Token share
No usage
3.66%
Tokens
No usage
8.3T+526%
No trend data
JUN 19AUG 13
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeStep 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Qwen3.8 MaxStep 3.5 Flash 2603·Qwen3.8 MaxNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxMiMo-V2.5·Qwen3.8 MaxRelated comparisonStep 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Qwen3.8 Max PreviewStep 3.5 Flash 2603·Qwen3.8 Max PreviewRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PreviewMiMo-V2.5·Qwen3.8 Max Preview