Compare AI models: Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Grok 4.6

Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflectionHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Beam 1.0 501B A23B	50/100	88/100	61/100	93/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Grok 4.6	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	39/100	26/100	75/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Reflection

xAI

Context length

500K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text

Text, Image

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Reflection

xAI

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$2.00/ 1M

Output

$1.00/ 1M

$6.00/ 1M

Cached input

$0.04/ 1M

$0.50/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

127K

59K

Completed sessions

3,127,904

134,764

Token share

0.58%

0.01%

Tokens

6.6T+100%

71B+715%

AUG 29OCT 23

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

41.3%3.3K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructBeam 1.0 501B A23BDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.6Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Jamba MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23BJamba Mini Related comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6Jamba Mini