Compare AI models: Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflectionHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beam 1.0 501B A23B | 50/100 | 88/100 | 61/100 | 93/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 32/100 | 96/100 | 59/100 | 54/100 | 50/100 | 55/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Output
$1.00/ 1M
$1.21/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
127K
No usage
Completed sessions
3,127,904
No usage
Token share
0.58%
No usage
Tokens
6.6T+100%
No usage
AUG 29OCT 23
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeStep 3.7 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructStep 3.7 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Jamba MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba MiniStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba Mini