Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max vs GLM-5.1

Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
GLM-5.1ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Qwen3.8 Max	88/100	100/100	26/100	82/100	67/100	91/100
GLM-5.1	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	88/100	33/100	47/100	0/100	45/100

Overview

Author

Qwen

Zhipu

Context length

200K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video, Pdf

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Qwen

Zhipu

Pricing

Input

$2.00/ 1M

$0.90/ 1M

Output

$6.00/ 1M

$3.59/ 1M

Cached input

$0.25/ 1M

$0.19/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

119K

41K

Completed sessions

531,994

100,859

Token share

0.02%

0.01%

Tokens

264B+20%

66B-78%

AUG 30OCT 24

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

45.9%6.2K user-weeks

55.8%1.8K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 MaxDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGLM-5.1 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.1Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonQwen3.8 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 MaxJamba Mini Related comparisonGLM-5.1 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.1Jamba Mini