Compare AI models: Sonar Deep Research vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexityHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonar Deep Research | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 24/100 | 21/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 — Tool calling not supported |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 32/100 | 96/100 | 63/100 | 52/100 | 50/100 | 55/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
128K
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.18/ 1M
Output
$8.00/ 1M
$1.11/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeSonar Deep Research vs Jamba MiniSonar Deep Research·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba MiniStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonSonar Deep Research vs Jamba LargeSonar Deep Research·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba LargeStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba Large