Compare AI models: GPT-5 Nano vs GLM-5.1
- GPT-5 NanoOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5.1ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 75/100 | 73/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GLM-5.1 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 88/100 | 34/100 | 46/100 | 0/100 | 45/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
400K
200K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.05/ 1M
$0.90/ 1M
Output
$0.40/ 1M
$3.59/ 1M
Cached input
$0.005/ 1M
$0.19/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
9K
35K
Completed sessions
68,874
92,105
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
5.6B+67%
49B-81%
SEP 5OCT 30
SEP 5OCT 30
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
51.1%1.4K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGPT-5 Nano vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5 Nano·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.1 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.1·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGPT-5 Nano vs Jamba MiniGPT-5 Nano·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.1 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.1·Jamba Mini