Compare AI models: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Hy4
- GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
- Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 Luna | 69/100 | 81/100 | 58/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 64/100 |
| Hy4 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 54/100 | 92/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1.1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.42/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$1.25/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
269K
4.4K
Completed sessions
1,733,407
18,931
Token share
0.14%
0%
Tokens
1.9T-71%
57B+100%
SEP 12NOV 6
SEP 12NOV 6
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
52.5%23K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGPT-5.6 Luna vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5.6 Luna·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeHy4 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGPT-5.6 Luna vs Jamba MiniGPT-5.6 Luna·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonHy4 vs Jamba MiniHy4·Jamba Mini