Compare AI models: GPT-5.6 Luna vs flint-40b
- GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
- flint-40bRecursiveHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 Luna | 69/100 | 81/100 | 59/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 64/100 |
| flint-40b | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder |
Overview
Author
Context length
1.1M
Unknown
Reasoning
True
Unknown
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Unknown
Output modalities
Text
Unknown
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.20/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$1.20/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
333K
28K
Completed sessions
2,008,414
318,640
Token share
0.22%
0.02%
Tokens
2.6T-53%
198B+100%
SEP 1OCT 26
SEP 1OCT 26
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
53.8%27K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGPT-5.6 Luna vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5.6 Luna·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeflint-40b vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructflint-40b·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGPT-5.6 Luna vs Jamba MiniGPT-5.6 Luna·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonflint-40b vs Jamba Miniflint-40b·Jamba Mini