Compare AI models: Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs MiMo-V2.5
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 93/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| MiMo-V2.5 | 17/100 | 53/100 | 72/100 | 93/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$0.19/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$0.39/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.003851/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
1.3M
Completed sessions
No usage
51,677,025
Token share
No usage
3.51%
Tokens
No usage
37T+30%
No trend data
AUG 27OCT 21
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
70.5%23K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5 vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.5 vs Jamba LargeMiMo-V2.5·Jamba Large