Compare AI models: Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 93/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 32/100 | 96/100 | 60/100 | 53/100 | 50/100 | 55/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$0.20/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$1.15/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba MiniStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba LargeStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba Large