CompareAI models

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNvidiaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	37/100	87/100	61/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiMo-V2.5	17/100	53/100	78/100	92/100	67/100	50/100

Overview

Author

NVIDIA

Xiaomi

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text

Text, Image, Audio, Video

Output modalities

Text

Providers

NVIDIA

Xiaomi

Pricing

Input

$0.05/ 1M

$0.16/ 1M

Output

$0.20/ 1M

$0.32/ 1M

Cached input

$0.01/ 1M

$0.004/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

258K

1.9M

Completed sessions

4,636,522

55,747,650

Token share

0.51%

7.49%

Tokens

4T+100%

60T+404%

AUG 1SEP 25

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

72.7%28K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Mini Nearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5 vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.5Jamba Mini Related comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Large Related comparisonMiMo-V2.5 vs Jamba LargeMiMo-V2.5Jamba Large