Compare AI models: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Grok 4.7

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	37/100	86/100	64/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Grok 4.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	71/100	28/100	75/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

NVIDIA

xAI

Context length

262K

500K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text

Text, Image, Pdf

Output modalities

Text

Providers

NVIDIA

xAI

Pricing

Input

$0.05/ 1M

$2.00/ 1M

Output

$0.20/ 1M

$6.00/ 1M

Cached input

$0.01/ 1M

$0.50/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

280K

32K

Completed sessions

6,923,847

71,495

Token share

0.47%

Tokens

4.7T+486%

38B+100%

AUG 20OCT 14

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

42.5%785 user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Mini Nearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7Jamba Mini Related comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Large Related comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba LargeGrok 4.7Jamba Large