Compare AI models: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Grok 4.6
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | 0/100 | 37/100 | 86/100 | 64/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 36/100 | 28/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.05/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
276K
60K
Completed sessions
6,901,358
129,299
Token share
0.47%
0.01%
Tokens
4.7T+414%
77B+100%
AUG 21OCT 15
AUG 21OCT 15
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
40.8%3.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba LargeGrok 4.6·Jamba Large