Compare AI models: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs omen-alpha

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
omen-alphaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	34/100	88/100	63/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
omen-alpha	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder

Overview

Author

NVIDIA

Context length

262K

Unknown

Reasoning

True

Unknown

Input modalities

Text

Unknown

Output modalities

Text

Unknown

Providers

NVIDIA

Pricing

Input

$0.03/ 1M

Unknown

Output

$0.12/ 1M

Unknown

Cached input

$0.01/ 1M

Unknown

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

237K

88K

Completed sessions

7,227,406

582,608

Token share

0.39%

0.2%

Tokens

4.4T+133%

2.3T+100%

AUG 30OCT 24

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

63.6%4.2K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeomen-alpha vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructomen-alphaDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Mini Related comparisonomen-alpha vs Jamba Miniomen-alphaJamba Mini