Compare AI models: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | 0/100 | 37/100 | 86/100 | 61/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 33/100 | 96/100 | 65/100 | 51/100 | 50/100 | 55/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.05/ 1M
$0.18/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$1.11/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
285K
No usage
Completed sessions
5,936,306
No usage
Token share
0.48%
No usage
Tokens
4.6T+4,221%
No usage
AUG 13OCT 7
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba MiniStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba LargeStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba Large