CompareAI models
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNvidia
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603StepFun
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | 100/100 | No data | 87/100 | 62/100 | 0/100 | No data |
| Step 3.5 Flash 2603 | 100/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 53/100 | 0/100 | 90/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.08/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
198K
No usage
Completed sessions
2,449,980
No usage
Token share
0.59%
No usage
Tokens
3.2T+100%
No usage
JUL 17SEP 10
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeStep 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITStep 3.5 Flash 2603·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Qwen3.8 Max 0902Related comparisonStep 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Step 3.5 Flash 2603·Qwen3.8 Max 0902