Compare AI models: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs flint-40b

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
flint-40bRecursiveHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	34/100	84/100	63/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
flint-40b	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder

Overview

Author

NVIDIA

Recursive

Context length

262K

Unknown

Reasoning

True

Unknown

Input modalities

Text

Unknown

Output modalities

Text

Unknown

Providers

NVIDIA

Recursive

Pricing

Input

$0.05/ 1M

Unknown

Output

$0.20/ 1M

Unknown

Cached input

$0.01/ 1M

Unknown

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

202K

42K

Completed sessions

6,179,589

461,345

Token share

0.33%

0.04%

Tokens

4.1T+54%

472B+100%

SEP 5OCT 30

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeflint-40b vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructflint-40bDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Mini Related comparisonflint-40b vs Jamba Miniflint-40bJamba Mini