Compare AI models: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Hy4 preview
- Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Hy4 previewTencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 17/100 | 93/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Hy4 preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 39/100 | 87/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.83/ 1M
Output
$10/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
8.8K
54K
Completed sessions
22,686
127,014
Token share
0%
0.03%
Tokens
49B+100%
329B+695%
AUG 31OCT 25
AUG 31OCT 25
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
54.3%1.6K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3.1 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeHy4 preview vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4 preview·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Jamba MiniKimi K3.1 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonHy4 preview vs Jamba MiniHy4 preview·Jamba Mini