Compare AI models: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Hy3
- Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Hy3Tencent
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 18/100 | 93/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Hy3 | 67/100 | 68/100 | 69/100 | 53/100 | 0/100 | 40/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.14/ 1M
Output
$10/ 1M
$0.58/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
4.5K
85K
Completed sessions
11,380
701,594
Token share
0%
0.04%
Tokens
22B+100%
458B-93%
AUG 30OCT 24
AUG 30OCT 24
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
70.1%2.9K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3.1 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeHy3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Jamba MiniKimi K3.1 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonHy3 vs Jamba MiniHy3·Jamba Mini