Compare AI models: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 17/100 | 93/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 32/100 | 96/100 | 59/100 | 54/100 | 50/100 | 55/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Output
$10/ 1M
$1.21/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
0
No usage
Completed sessions
4
No usage
Token share
0%
No usage
Tokens
00%
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3.1 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeStep 3.7 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructStep 3.7 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Jamba MiniKimi K3.1 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba MiniStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba Mini