Compare AI models: Kimi K2.6 vs Hy3
- Kimi K2.6MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Hy3Tencent
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 78/100 | 34/100 | 63/100 | 50/100 | 27/100 |
| Hy3 | 67/100 | 68/100 | 69/100 | 53/100 | 0/100 | 40/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.74/ 1M
$0.14/ 1M
Output
$3.72/ 1M
$0.58/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
70K
68K
Completed sessions
238,810
480,702
Token share
0.01%
0.02%
Tokens
117B-81%
252B-96%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
56.6%2.7K user-weeks
63.9%1.9K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K2.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeHy3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K2.6 vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.6·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonHy3 vs Jamba MiniHy3·Jamba Mini