Compare AI models: Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed
- Kimi K2.6MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 78/100 | 46/100 | 64/100 | 50/100 | 27/100 |
| Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 22/100 | 64/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.45/ 1M
$1.90/ 1M
Output
$1.89/ 1M
$8.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.08/ 1M
$0.32/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
78K
0
Completed sessions
241,113
6
Token share
0.01%
0%
Tokens
140B-80%
00%
AUG 29OCT 23
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.6%3.3K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K2.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K2.6 vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.6·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed·Jamba Mini