Compare AI models: Kimi K2.5 vs Grok 4.5
- Kimi K2.5MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.5xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 20/100 | 38/100 | 63/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 90/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 57/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.60/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$3.00/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
4.9K
5.7K
Completed sessions
13,560
37,948
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
248M-99%
588M-100%
AUG 31OCT 25
AUG 31OCT 25
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.9%133 user-weeks
46.4%373 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K2.5 vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.5 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.5·Jamba Mini