CompareAI models
- Kimi K2.5Moonshot
- Grok 4.5xAI
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2.5 | 100/100 | 20/100 | 42/100 | 64/100 | 50/100 | No data |
| Grok 4.5 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 29/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 62/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.60/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$3.00/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
60K
128K
Completed sessions
2,756
106,154
Token share
0.01%
0.03%
Tokens
43B-85%
123B+100%
JUL 8SEP 1
JUL 8SEP 1
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.1%875 user-weeks
47.3%4.8K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K2.5 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITKimi K2.5·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeGrok 4.5 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITGrok 4.5·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonKimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextKimi K2.5·Qwen3.8 Flash NextRelated comparisonGrok 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGrok 4.5·Qwen3.8 Flash Next