Compare AI models: Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM-5.2

Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
GLM-5.2Zhipu

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Kimi K2.7 Code	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	32/100	62/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
GLM-5.2	100/100	100/100	29/100	80/100	0/100	88/100

Overview

Author

Moonshot

Zhipu

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Moonshot

Zhipu

Pricing

Input

$0.86/ 1M

$1.20/ 1M

Output

$3.80/ 1M

$4.18/ 1M

Cached input

$0.18/ 1M

$0.30/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

152K

111K

Completed sessions

591,738

509,790

Token share

0.09%

0.03%

Tokens

1.3T-26%

505B-83%

SEP 21NOV 15

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

56.5%12K user-weeks

50.8%8.5K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeKimi K2.7 Code vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.7 CodeDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGLM-5.2 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.2Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonKimi K2.7 Code vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.7 CodeJamba Mini Related comparisonGLM-5.2 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.2Jamba Mini