Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
- MiniMax-M3MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflectionHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 83/100 | 54/100 | 92/100 | 50/100 | 21/100 |
| Beam 1.0 501B A23B | 50/100 | 88/100 | 100/100 | 92/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.06/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
199K
186K
Completed sessions
1,668,009
3,964,275
Token share
0.18%
0.83%
Tokens
2.1T-56%
9.9T+100%
SEP 2OCT 27
SEP 2OCT 27
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.2%12K user-weeks
63.3%983 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Jamba MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Jamba Mini