Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 68/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 14/100 | 71/100 | 60/100 | 92/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.43/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$0.87/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.0036/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
934K
77K
Completed sessions
125,558,422
343,420
Token share
15.8%
0.06%
Tokens
188T+100%
666B-69%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
75.4%11K user-weeks
59.6%3.6K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.5-Pro·Jamba Mini