Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 69/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 32/100 | 96/100 | 61/100 | 53/100 | 50/100 | 55/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$1.15/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2
No usage
Completed sessions
8
No usage
Token share
0%
No usage
Tokens
5.7K+100%
No usage
AUG 25OCT 19
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba MiniStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba LargeStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba Large