Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GPT-6.1 SolOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 66/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 16/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
930K
No usage
Completed sessions
125,533,627
No usage
Token share
15.9%
No usage
Tokens
188T+100%
No usage
SEP 1OCT 26
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
75.4%11K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-6.1 Sol vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-6.1 Sol·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-6.1 Sol vs Jamba MiniGPT-6.1 Sol·Jamba Mini